Sam Armemtrage saved his money for a down payment on a new home, negotiated a fifteen year mortgage loan on the remainder of the purchase price and moved into his Lawrenceville dream home. After fifteen years his mortgage company quit sending him a bill.
How did he do this? He paid his mortgage payment on time every month without fail. Not once in those fifteen years did he face foreclosure.
George Chidi makes a lot of sense here and reflects exactly my thought on the matter.
Let me state the obvious: whoever is responsible for storing material under the interstate that could melt a bridge had better still be in prison when Eleby gets out.
Source: Sure. Blame The Crackhead. – GeorgiaPol
The headlines proclaim “Adviser reassigned after disagreeing with Trump”, but that isn’t quite the case here. He did more than disagree with him.
Deare reportedly knocked the Trump administration’s handling of Latin American policies during a speech at The Wilson Center Thursday in Washington. He also criticized overall White House dysfunction, Politico reported based on a source.
Source: White House confirms adviser reassigned after disagreeing with Trump – CNNPolitics.com
It sounds more like he slammed the administrations policies in public. That goes a lot further than disagreeing with the president.
It is the job of any adviser to point out opposing opinions to the president and even advocate for them in private. That disagreement should always remain private during the term of the president. Public disclosure of dissent from the presidents advisers can take place after the administration has had its run.
I’m reading this and my imagination kind of walks away with me. When Flynn was in contact with the Russian diplomat was he wearing a Stetson and drinking bourbon? Maybe he was wearing a linen suit and smoking a Cuban cigar. No, I think he was probably wearing a gray jacket with a Nehru collar and petting a fluffy white cat.
What could have been going through his mind?!? Did he act like this when he was an active duty general? Did he have some sort of idea he was some Machiavellian genius? Maybe his two years as Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency made him think Trump hired him to be a man of intrigue. No, Trump hired him as someone from the opposing party who could give him a broader understanding of national security.
Good grief this story gives me the willies just thinking that someone scheming and conniving like this was a three star general in our military.
Intelligence officials feared the national security adviser had misled the vice president after saying he did not discuss sanctions with the Russian ambassador.
Source: Justice Department warned White House that Flynn could be vulnerable to Russian blackmail, officials say – The Washington Post
Giving the devil his due, this is a brilliant move by Putin if he is looking to make the exiting Obama administration look small all while endearing himself to the incoming Trump administration. My hope is that President Trump recognizes this and uses it to his own advantage.
“We won’t create problems for American diplomats,” Putin said in a statement released by his press service Friday afternoon, adding that Russia retained the right to punish U.S. diplomats in the future. He said he would “plan further steps for restoring the Russian-American relationship based on the policies enacted by the administration of President Donald Trump.”
Source: Putin says he won’t deport U.S. diplomats as he looks to cultivate relations with Trump – The Washington Post
Why, oh, why didn’t President Obama see this coming? Whatever proof our intelligence agencies have that it was the Russians behind the DNC network intrusion is of such a technical nature that it is easily dismissed by anyone not incredibly technically sophisticated who is the least bit inclined to dismiss it.
According to this Clean Technica article infrastructure projects that incorporate bicycle and pedestrian elements create about 46% more jobs than road-only projects. The study it quotes states:
Using actual bid price and cost data, the study compares 58 projects in 11 cities and finds that bike projects create 46% more jobs than road projects without bike or pedestrian components. On average, the ‘road-only’ projects evaluated created 7.8 jobs per million, while the ‘bicycling-only’ projects provided 11.4 jobs per million. For example, a roadway-focused project with no bicycle or pedestrian components in Santa Cruz, California generated 4.94 jobs per $1 million spent. In contrast, a bicycle-focused project in Baltimore, Md produced 14.35 jobs per million. The PERI reviewers attribute the difference to the simple fact that bicycle and pedestrian projects are often more labor intensive.”
When you add in the additional benefits of less pollution and a healthier citizenry why aren’t pedestrian and bicycling elements included in every large scale road project?
So Hillary Clinton lost the election and she disappeared into the woods until a few days ago. Now that her month of soul searching is over what is she going to do about all those promises she made? Will she attempt to keep them?
She could still have an effect on the world, even as just a private citizen. This article brings up some very good points about losing politicians. They seem to just give up after losing. It points to Al Gore just disappearing after his loss to George W. Bush and again to John Kerry. Both made a ton of promises as presidential candidates but pretty much gave up on those promises when they lost.
So, will Hillary Clinton do the same? Is her life of public service over?
There are all kinds of ways one can look at the election. You can look at it as if the majority of Americans supported Hillary Clinton (which she did, by 2.8 million votes) or you can look at it as though Donald Trump won broader geographic support across the country (which he did, to the tune of 30 states to 21 states and the District of Columbia).
But why is this important? It’s important because of a thing called a mandate. In other words which side won enough support to be able to say this is the way the country wants to be lead. So here is what the Democrats are going to say about a mandate.
Republicans have the right to govern but they don’t have a mandate for their policies. If we don’t start to make that point, each and every day, then we will wake up in a few months and find out Republicans have taken the country in a new direction.
Source: Donald Trump and the Republicans Have No Mandate | TIME
I fully agree with Mr. Ferguson on that statement. Democrats have to take away any notion that President-elect Trump has a mandate. They have to stress that point over and over because it really doesn’t matter how many votes one has or how broad of support one has a mandate comes from naming it and claiming it. If the Republicans can convince you of their mandate then they have it. If the Democrats succeed in dissuading you from that notion then the Republicans lose it.
As my friend, Dan, is fond of pointing out government is an illusion in the minds of the governed. My suggestion is that you keep an eye on all office holders and let them know when they are overstepping their bounds.
Okay, I can go along with this strategy during the election campaign. In fact, this was probably the best strategy to follow. However, now that the election is over it isn’t in our nations best interest to continue this campaign.
While the messaging has evolved, the motive has becoming strikingly apparent: It’s an unrepentant effort to delegitimize President-elect Donald Trump and absolve Clinton of the lion’s share of electoral liability.
Source: The Delegitimization Of Donald Trump | The Run 2016 | US News